Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Contract with America. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Contract with America. Show all posts

Saturday, September 27, 2014

Contract Refuseniks

At NewsMax, Marco Rubio writes:
This method of leadership, powered by ideas and sustained by an open communication of those ideas to the people they impact, is certainly not one that I invented myself. Others have taken a similar approach, often with great success. One of the most notable instances in our nation’s history was an initiative announced 20 years ago: the "Contract With America."
It was led by a remarkable idea man: Rep. Newt Gingrich of Georgia, then minority whip and future speaker of the House. He partnered with other Republican leaders, including Texas Rep. Dick Armey and policy leaders at the Heritage Foundation, to craft a revolutionary collection of ideas for restoring the promise of America.
Every Republican candidate signed the contract — and that November, the American people gave it their stamp of approval by giving Republicans the majority.
Senator Rubio is mistaken.  Seven Republicans refused to sign the contract:

  • Sam Brownback (Kansas)
  • Jim Bunn (Oregon)
  • Tom Coburn (Oklahoma)
  • Lincoln Diaz-Balart (Florida)
  • Ray LaHood (Illinois)
  • Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (Florida)
  • Don Young (Alaska)

Tuesday, May 27, 2014

Would a Senate "Contract with America" Make Sense?

A faction of Republicans including Sen. Lindsey Graham is agitating for party leaders to unveil a policy manifesto in the midterm elections, detailing for voters what the GOP would attempt with a Senate majority its members are increasingly confident they’ll achieve.
Advocates of the strategy, which has triggered a closed-door debate in recent weeks among the party’s current 45 senators, say it would serve as a firm rejoinder to Democrats casting the GOP as the “party of no.” They say voters should know what they’d be getting by pulling the lever for Republicans in November.
...
The policy agenda would be modeled after the “Contract with America,” the 10-bill document that Republicans campaigned on en route to a historic takeover of the House in 1994.
There are several problems with this approach.

First, when the House Republicans crafted the Contract in 1994, they had not controlled the chamber in forty years.  They were writing on a blank slate, since no one could contrast their promises with their past performance.   Senate Republicans, who had a majority just eight years ago, do not have that luxury. We know what a GOP Senate looks like.

Second, the Contract had the virtue of apparent novelty:  most people in the political community could not remember anything like it.  (Actually, there had been something like it in 1980 -- but few noticed at the time and even fewer could recall it fourteen years later.)   In 2014, a Senate Contract would invite comparisons with the 1994 version, and it would be a challenge to make it as specific and appealing.

Third, as Major Garrett explains in The Enduring Revolution, the drafters of the original contract had plenty of material to work with. Many conservative policy ideas had been circulating for years, and leaders were able to find ten that would unify their ranks and sound good to the general public.  Are there ten such ideas today?  A number of the earlier ideas have either gone into effect (e.g., welfare reform) or become politically problematic.  (The line-item veto lost a lot of Republican fans when Clinton used it.)

Fourth although the individual ideas in the Contract were popular, a pre-election poll found that 71 percent of Americans had never heard of the Contract itself.  On balance, it did some good for the GOP, but it was hardly the silver bullet of Republican mythology.


Tuesday, July 6, 2010

House GOP Agenda Survey

Chief Deputy Minority Whip Kevin McCarthy (Calif.) last week asked Republican Members to fill out a three-page “private survey” reporting what constituents have told them are the most important issues facing the country.

The poll is part of the America Speaking Out project, a multipronged effort launched by House Republican leaders in May to gather ideas for their new agenda from citizens around the country.

Republicans expect to release the final policy document in September.

The effort bears a striking resemblance to the Contract with America. In 1994, House GOP leaders surveyed their members, and held the signing event in September.

Thursday, April 15, 2010

Contract II?

House Republicans disagree on whether they should offer a "Contract with America" that offers specific legislation. Politico reports: