Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Boxer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Boxer. Show all posts

Saturday, January 13, 2018

Anti-Rohrabacher Ad

 In Defying the Odds, we discuss state and congressional races as well as the presidential election.

Issa and Royce are out. Now, Barbara Boxer's PAC for a Change is going after Dana Rohrabacher.

Friday, January 9, 2015

Top Two and the California Senate Race

In the 2012 "top two" primary for California's Democratic-leaning 31st congressional district, a split among Democrats enabled two Republicans to advance to the fall election. 

At Powerline, Steve Hayward proposes an unlikely -- but not impossible -- replay of this scenario in the 2016 California Senate race:
Assume a crowded Democratic field with several good, well-funded candidates. Assume Republicans could rally around just two really good candidates. Suppose a large and divided Democratic field left the two Republicans as the top vote getters in the primary. Could Republicans plausibly sneak away with California’s Senate seat by exploiting this ill-thought “good government” jungle primary reform?
It is worth pondering. It is hard to clear a primary field for national offices like the Senate because political ambition is overweening, but it would be fun to watch the liberal panic if it came about. GOP party elders in California, if there are such, should think strategically about this.
P.S. Or, if Republicans really want to be clever, they won’t run a candidate at all, but would instead back Mickey Kaus in the Democratic field. Wouldn’t that be fun.

Thursday, January 8, 2015

Boxer's Retirement

Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) has announced that she will not run for reelection.

In the Democratic race, Lieutenant Governor Gavin Newsom and Attorney General Kamala Harris have the advantage of statewide name recognition.  They may end up with a tacit understanding that one will run for Senate in 2016 and the other will run for governor in 2018, but the hard part will be deciding who runs for which office.  Some Democratic House members may be also be looking at the race.  It seems likely that the GOP will hold the majority in the House for a few more years at least, whereas Democrats have a reasonably good chance of regaining the Senate next year.  (Ed Markey of Massachusetts, who was among the most senior House Democrats, gladly ran for the chance to be the least senior member of the Senate Democratic majority.)

It would be really hard for a Republican to win a Senate seat in California.  No Republican has done so since Pete Wilson in 1988.  Republicans can sometimes win blue-state governorships (Illinois, Maryland, and Massachusetts in 2014, for instance), but a senatorial election is a different kind of vote.  National issues and party identification play a bigger role in Senate elections:  only 15 senators come from statesthat went for the opposite party in the 2012 presidential election. In California, party registration and party identification are deep blue.  And since 2016 will be a presidential election year, we can expect Democratic turnout to be reasonably high in California.

Republicans have a weak bench in California.  They hold no statewide offices.  No Republican House member from California has statewide name recognition.  Even House majority leader Kevin McCarthy is a familiar name only among political junkies.  If Californians have heard the name at all, they’ll think of the actor who starred in Invasion of the Body Snatchers.

There are a couple of significant GOP mayors, Kevin Faulconer of San Diego and Ashley Swearengin of Fresno, but they are little-known statewide. (Swearengin ran for controller in 2014, and lost.)

Running in California requires lots of money.  Rep.Darrell Issa is very wealthy, and may wish to move up now that term limits have forced him to give up the chair of the House Oversight Committee.  But he is probably too conservative to win statewide, and ethics issues would dog him in a statewide campaign.  There may be other rich Republicans out there, but memories of Meg Whitman may deter them.  In the 2010 gubernatorial race, she spent lavishly from her eBay fortune, but still lost badly to Jerry Brown.


With some financial backing, a moderate-to-liberal Republican might have an outside chance.  Schwarzenegger designed the top-two primary to encourage the nomination of such candidates, but evidence for its effectiveness is mixed.  Anyway, it is hard to identify who the moderate-to-liberal Republican would be.  Tom Campbell ran against Feinstein in 2000 and lost by nearly 20 points.  Neel Kashkari had to spend a large share of his personal funds to run for governor in 2014, and it is unlikely that he could afford to run statewide so soon. 

Monday, November 10, 2014

The California Gerontocracy

California, the land of youth, has the nation's oldest senator and governor.

At The Washington Post, Aaron Blake reports:
A new poll from the University of Southern California shows that although Feinstein and Boxer have image ratings that are much more positive than negative (by double digits), about six in 10 Californians (59 percent) would prefer that they not seek reelection. Just three in 10 (29 percent) say they should run again.
Nearly half of Californians -- 48 percent -- say they "strongly" want new people to run. Even among Democrats, 44 percent say it's time for new blood, while 43 percent say the two senators should seek reelection.
...
At least part of the reason for the call for a changing of the guards is undoubtedly that Feinstein and Boxer are among the nation's oldest senators. Feinstein is the oldest senator, at 81, while Boxer, who is 73, ranks 16th.
Also note that the just-reelected Jerry Brown  (born April 7, 1938 (age 76)) is the oldest governor in the United States,* and both the oldest and longest-serving governor in California history.  What is more, a member of the Brown family was on the statewide ballot in 15 of the past 18 gubernatorial election years.

A few months ago, Alexander Burns noted at Politico:
The most prominent member of the congressional delegation, 74-year-old House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, started out as chairwoman of the California Democratic Party when Ronald Reagan was president. The current party chairman, 81-year-old John Burton, is a former congressman who first went to Washington in the 1974 post-Watergate revolution.

* Hawaii's Neil Abercrombie is also 76 but was born a few weeks later, on June 26, 1938.  In any case, he will no longer be governor next year, as he lost his primary.

Monday, November 1, 2010

CA: Boxer Attacks on Fiorina

Mike Zapler writes at The Contra Costa Times:

In mid-September, many California voters got their first introduction to Republican Senate candidate Carly Fiorina, and it was not a pleasant one. She was, TV viewers were told over and over again, a heartless corporate bigwig who blithely fired her workers and sent their jobs overseas, all while raking in millions and living the high life.

The former Hewlett-Packard CEO has barely responded to that damning portrayal in a 30-second TV ad aired by her opponent, Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer. And if the first-time candidate loses on Tuesday, as polls indicate is likely [or not: see PPP poll --ed.] , one of the main reasons will be that she violated a cardinal rule of politics: Don't allow your opponent to define you.



Monday, October 25, 2010

CA: Fiorina Doing Better Than Whitman, So Far

Ron Brownstein observes at National Journal:

For all of the contests’ surface similarities -- high-tech female Republican CEO vs. venerable California liberal -- the races are running on very different dynamics. The difference was apparent within minutes when Brown and Boxer each appeared before President Obama during his rally at the University of Southern California last Friday.

Still, probably the most important difference between the two races is their contrasting backdrop. “It’s the Washington dynamic versus the Sacramento dynamic,” said a senior Democratic strategist working in the state, who asked for anonymity while discussing the vulnerabilities of the party’s contenders. “Which is to say you’ve got a Democratic president, Democratic Congress and Democratic senator who get blamed, if you will, at the federal level while you have a…Republican governor in Sacramento [Arnold Schwarzenegger] who is extraordinarily unpopular and that hurts Whitman. Boxer gets hurt by the national scene; Whitman gets hurt by the local scene.”



Thursday, October 21, 2010

CA: PPIC Poll

PPIC reports that the Senate race is closer than the governor race -- the opposite of what one might have expected months ago.

Democrat Jerry Brown leads Republican Meg Whitman in the governor’s race, and Democratic incumbent Barbara Boxer is locked in a close contest with Republican challenger Carly Fiorina in the U.S Senate campaign. These are the results of a survey released today by the Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) with funding from The James Irvine Foundation.

Likely voters favor Brown over Whitman by 8 points (44% Brown, 36% Whitman, 16% undecided). The two candidates were in a virtual tie in September (38% Whitman, 37% Brown, 18% undecided). The Senate race is tight (43% Boxer, 38% Fiorina, 13% undecided) among likely voters. Boxer held a 7-point lead in September (42% Boxer, 35% Fiorina, 17% undecided).

In the final weeks of the campaign season, California’s likely voters express discontent in a number of ways: approval ratings of elected officials that are at or near record lows, a belief that the state and nation are headed in the wrong direction, and pessimism about the economy. While most (62%) are satisfied with their choice for U.S. Senate, more than half (55%) are dissatisfied with their choice for governor. Farther down the statewide ballot, none of the four state ballot initiatives included in the PPIC survey has the majority support today that is necessary for passage on November 2.

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

CA: Paid & Free Media in Senate Race

Boxer deploys POTUS, who is still popular in the state:




Music features in the campaign:





The Hill reports:

On Sunday morning, California GOP Senate hopeful Carly Fiorina joined Chris Wallace, host of “Fox News Sunday,” for what should have been a friendly interview. Instead, it was a train wreck.

Wallace started his questioning by explaining that an extension of all the George W. Bush-era tax cuts would increase the federal debt by $4 trillion over the next decade. He then pressed Fiorina to explain what specific areas of the federal budget she would cut in order to close the budget gap. Over and over, she repeated her desire to balance the budget, but she failed to detail any cuts. Instead, she emphasized closing the budget gap by addressing the “waste, inefficiency and fraud” in Washington.

Sunday, October 17, 2010

CA: Campaign Visitors

Jonathan Martin notes at Politico:

There were 19 Republicans sitting on stage behind Sarah Palin when she rallied GOP activists here Saturday, but none was named Meg Whitman or Carly Fiorina.

And just as the Republican candidates for governor and Senate here were physically absent from the event, they were also missing from Palin’s speech.

Not once during remarks that lasted just over 20 minutes did the former Alaska governor mention two of the national party’s most buzzed-about candidates running in the country’s largest state.

It’s possible that Palin didn’t want to mention Whitman and Fiorina for fear of handing Democrats fodder to use in the final two weeks of the election. She was on safer ground launching attacks against familiar national Democratic bogeymen and the mainstream media to a couple thousand Republicans who paid at least $25 per-person to the Republican National Committee to hear their party’s 2008 vice-presidential nominee.

Maeve Reston reports that John McCain got harshly personal about Boxer:

Former Republican presidential contender John McCain reunited with his onetime advisor Carly Fiorina on the campaign trail Saturday in San Diego, offering a blistering indictment of Barbara Boxer’s record on military issues and calling her the “most bitterly partisan, most anti-defense senator in the United States Senate today” -- an assessment he said he’d made while having “the unpleasant experience” of serving with her.

“When you hear her say that she supports the men and women in the military, my friends, she does not,” said McCain, a former Navy pilot who was held as a prisoner of war in Vietnam for five and half years after his plane was shot down in 1967. “Because she has never supported the mission; she has never supported victory whether it be in Iraq, or Afghanistan, or anywhere else in the world. Barbara Boxer wants to wave the white flag of surrender and endanger this nation’s national security. It’s time she went back to San Francisco with [House Speaker] Nancy Pelosi.”

Carla Marinucci reports at The San Francisco Chronicle:

Bill Clinton, who as president made more than 70 trips to California, has returned on a mission - to ensure that the blue-leaning state does not fall to fired-up Republicans as Democrats struggle to maintain their tenuous majorities in the 2010 midterm elections.

"I am pleading with you," the former president said as he stood before an adoring crowd of 6,000 students and Democrats at UCLA on Friday night alongside Democratic gubernatorial candidate Jerry Brown and San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom, who is running for lieutenant governor.

Delivering an impassioned sermon to young Democrats, Clinton portrayed Republicans - whom he derided as calling for capital gains cuts at the expense of educational funding and health care reform - as the party that wants to go back to "digging a hole" to the past instead of moving into the future and getting out of the current financial mess.

...

"The Democrats are trying everything short of electroshock therapy to wake their base up, which would seem to contradict with their strategy of pot to do the same," said a bemused California Republican Party Chairman Ron Nehring. "Resorting to Bill Clinton - who had some of the nastiest things to say about Barack Obama - to turn out Obama supporters is like trying to get Col. Sanders to turn out chicken."

But Nehring said the strategy also reveals a national weakness. "When Democrats nationally have to allocate their highest-profile surrogates to try to save their candidates here in California - what does that say about the state of play nationally?"


Monday, October 4, 2010

CA: Races Stay Tight; NRSC for Carly

California Democrats clung to narrow leads in three high-profile state-wide races as early voting began, according to the latest exclusive SurveyUSA polling for CBS 5. The poll also found increasing support for Proposition 19, which would legalize marijuana.

Download Full Poll Results (.pdf)

In the race for U.S. Senator, incumbent Democrat Barbara Boxer held onto a 46% to 43% advantage. That lead is unchanged from a poll released 12 days ago and within the poll’s margin of error of ± 3.9%.

In the race for the open Governor’s seat, Democrat Jerry Brown inched slightly higher in the latest poll, where he holds a 47% to 43% advantage. The percentage of Brown backers is up a point since the previous poll. The numbers for Republican Meg Whitman remained flat.


Carolyn Lochhead reports at The San Francisco Chronicle:

For weeks, Democrats have pushing the story that the national Republican Party -- looking at the gap incumbent Sen. Barbara Boxer is opening in the polls against Republican challenger Carly Fiorina --was pulling the plug on it's $1.9 million ad campaign to defeat Boxer.

The Republicans said that was a lie, and today, made good on at least part of their promise by funding Fiorina's second TV spot, a 30-second ad called "Day," funded by the National Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee. The ad buy indicates the GOP is confident enough in Fiorina that it is willing to commit scarce campaign funds to a very expensive state. The GOP is betting on a wave election to take home a trophy as big as the Boxer seat.

The narrator is Robert "Demon Sheep" Davi:

Monday, September 27, 2010

CA: The Chronicle Says "None of the Above" in the Senate Race

The San Francisco Chronicle would never endorse a conservative such as Fiorina. But it is also rejecting Boxer:

For some Californians, Boxer's reliably liberal voting record may be reason enough to give her another six years in office. But we believe Californians deserve more than a usually correct vote on issues they care about. They deserve a senator who is accessible, effective and willing and able to reach across party lines to achieve progress on the great issues of our times. Boxer falls short on those counts.

Boxer's campaign, playing to resentment over Fiorina's wealth, is not only an example of the personalized pettiness that has infected too much of modern politics, it is also a clear sign of desperation.

In past elections, Boxer has had the good fortune of having Republican opponents who were inept, underfunded, on the fringe right - or combinations thereof. Her opponent this time, Fiorina, is proving to be articulate, well-funded and formidable.

Unfortunately for Californians who are eager for change, Fiorina has firmly staked out positions that are outside of the state's mainstream values and even its economic interest. The list only begins with her openness to offshore oil drilling, her opposition to the Roe vs. Wade abortion rights ruling and her unwillingness to support even the most commonsense gun-control measures to keep assault weapons off the street or to deny guns to suspected terrorists on the federal "no fly list."

...

It is a dismal choice between an ineffective advocate for causes we generally support and a potentially strong advocate for positions we oppose. Neither merits our endorsement for the U.S. Senate.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/09/26/EDCL1F4PRK.DTL#ixzz10kRalol9

Saturday, September 25, 2010

CA: Ma'am

The most predictable hit piece of the campaign:



Monday, September 20, 2010

CA: Where Boxer and Fiorina Get Campaign Money

Mike Zapler reports in The San Jose Mercury News:

On issue after issue, the battle for the Senate seat in California between incumbent Democrat Barbara Boxer and Republican Carly Fiorina is a study in contrasts. That is no less true when it comes to who is bankrolling their campaigns.

Trial lawyers, abortion-rights advocates and entertainment executives are among Boxer's top campaign contributors, while Wall Street investors and oil and mining interests are major financial backers of Fiorina's bid. And despite Fiorina's close Silicon Valley ties as a former Hewlett-Packard CEO, high-tech firms are giving substantially more money to Boxer, a three-term senator.

Sunday, September 19, 2010

CA: Joint Fundraising

CQ/Roll Call reports:

Parties and politicians preparing for the final months of the 2010 election cycle have opened a record number of joint fundraising committees to allow donors to write larger checks than individual campaigns can collect.

Campaigns have filed paperwork for more than 700 such groups since the beginning of 2009 — doubling the number that were active during the 2006 midterm elections, according to a CQ MoneyLine study of Federal Election Commission records.

Joint fundraising committees are separate entities set up by existing committees that allow them to fundraise together at joint events. Usually a campaign is limited to raising a maximum of $2,400 from one donor per election. But joint fundraising committees receive checks that are often in excess of $20,000 at major fundraising events. These large sums of money are pooled together through the committee, then divided among campaigns, parties and even politicians’ political action committees.

“Candidates are under more pressure than ever to raise money, and it may simply be that word is getting around that this is a simple way to do it,” said Paul Ryan, FEC program director and associate legal counsel for the Campaign Legal Center. “The only thing that a joint fundraising committee allows is for one check to be written instead of multiple checks.”

...

Under campaign finance laws, federal candidates can set up as many joint fundraising committees as they want. Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), who is running for re-election this year, has at least three such committees that have collected more than $1 million each.

In February, Politico reported:

“It’s kind of like the used-car-lot approach to fundraising,” said a longtime Democratic fundraiser. “You need as many cars out there as possible because you never know which one somebody will buy and take home with them.”

Besides joining with Reid, Boxer has also set up shared committees with the DSCC, the California Democratic Party and Minnesota Rep. James Oberstar, chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee.

Boxer’s cut from these committees amounted to more than $275,000 last year, a big chunk of which came from two fundraisers headlined by Vice President Joe Biden. Boxer reported having $7.2 million in cash on hand as of Dec. 31, according to her campaign’s latest filing with the Federal Election Commission.

“It’s efficient for the candidates and efficient for the donors,” said Boxer campaign manager Rose Kapolczynski. “The candidates have very busy schedules, so they look to combine two events into one.”

Back in 2009, NRSC established a joint fundraising committee with Carly Fiorina, which some saw as a quasi-endorsement in the GOP primary.

Friday, September 17, 2010

CA: The Senate Race Gets Personal

The San Francisco Chronicle reports:

Signaling a combative round in the California U.S. Senate contest, Republican Carly Fiorina on Thursday defended her new attack ad on "millionaire" U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer, charging that the Democrat has consistently tried to "play class warfare" on the issues.

Fiorina's online spot, "Failure," characterizes Boxer as a wealthy career politician. "Since she went to Washington, her taxpayer-funded salary has more than doubled," the ad says. "She has become a millionaire. And members of her family profit off her special-interest-backed political committees."

The third-term senator, who is paid $174,000 a year, has listed her blind trust as having a value of between $1 million and $5 million, according to Senate financial disclosure forms. Boxer, on the stump and in her TV ads, has consistently charged that Fiorina laid off 30,000 workers while earning a multimillion-dollar salary as CEO of Hewlett-Packard. But Fiorina has said Boxer has accepted contributions from other executives who have laid off workers.



Calbuzz reports:

Barbara Boxer unleashed a forceful attack on Carly Fiorina on Thursday – a purely negative ad noting that, as CEO of Hewlett-Packard, the Republican nominee for Senate laid off 30,000 workers, shipped jobs to China, tripled her own salary, bought a million-dollar yacht and five corporate jets.

Kaboom. That’s nasty. Especially because the charges are based in fact and the star of the ad is Hurricane Carly herself, defending the “massive layoffs” she implemented at H-P. And the kicker slogan is killer: “Carly Fiorina – outsourcing jobs, out for herself.”

You can’t get too much more negative than that, unless you were to accuse her of personally stealing Christmas from the crippled children of jobless workers.

But as Calbuzz always says: an election is not a tea party. Negative is fair, if it’s true.


Friday, September 10, 2010

CA: The Ads of Late Summer

Jerry Brown runs as a fiscally conservative job-creator:




Meg Whitman deploys Bill Clinton to rebut:




The US Chamber of Commerce is going after Boxer as someone who puts smelt before workers:




And Boxer answers with a jobs spot:


Thursday, August 26, 2010

American Crossroads GPS v. Boxer

The Los Angeles Times reports:

A conservative group with ties to former Bush adviser Karl Rove announced Wednesday they have Barbara Boxer in their sites.

The Crossroads GPS, announced they would hit the airwaves with a new "issue ad" focused on Boxer and her support for cuts to Medicare that were part of President Obama's health-care overhaul.

Crossroads said ads will run in Los Angeles, beginning Wednesday, for one week. The group says it spent $1 million to buy the TV airtime.

Crossroads GPS and its affiliate, American Crossroads, both receive advice and fundraising support from Rove. During a campaign stop at a beachfront cafe in Santa Monica Wednesday, Boxer said the group's interest in her race was evidence that a Fiorina win would mean a return to the policies of George W. Bush.

The ad -- which has a theme similar to an attack on Sestak -- is here:

Sunday, August 15, 2010

CA: Boxer Support

The Los Angeles Times reports:

With 80 days to go before the November election, Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer turned her energies to mobilizing volunteers Saturday, tapping into the Democrats’ national get-out-the-vote network, Organizing for America, during an appearance near downtown Los Angeles.

Joined by Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and U.S. Labor Secretary Hilda Solis, Boxer asked a group of about 100 volunteers to begin making phone calls and walking neighborhoods to ensure that first-time voters who supported President Obama in 2008 will turn out again in November when she will face former Hewlett-Packard Co. Chief Executive Carly Fiorina

Villaraigosa may or may not have been helpful with his remarks:

Villaraigosa, who described Boxer as one of his heroes because of her “unabashedly progressive” outlook, was on hand at Saturday's event to fire up volunteers and defend Boxer's record on local issues like his 30/10 plan, which would accelerate 12 transit projects to complete them in a decade instead of three.

“When you’re mayor of L.A., you go to two places when you’re looking for money,” Villaraigosa said. “You go to — well you used to go to Sacramento — and you go to Washington D.C., and I can tell you whenever I knock on her door, she’s there.”

The "unabashedly progressive" outlook may be a bit of a liability. Even in the 2008 election, the conservatives outnumbered liberals among California voters, with self-described moderates holding the balance. And talking up pork for Los Angeles may be less popular outside the city limits than within. Furthermore, the national debt has diminished the political appeal of pork in general. “Earmarks are no longer there to bail you out,” said Steve Ellis, vice president at Taxpayers for Common Sense recently told the New York Times. “They don’t make you bulletproof anymore.”


Wednesday, July 28, 2010

CA: Fiorina and Boxer

Michele Clock reports in The San Diego Union-Tribune:

In a San Diego campaign stop to showcase her support for veterans, Republican Senate candidate Carly Fiorina again criticized Democratic U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer for backing the federal economic stimulus act and questioned her support for the military.

Surrounded by about 60 people, many of them veterans, at the Veterans Museum and Memorial Center in Balboa Park on Tuesday, Fiorina said the stimulus act has actually cost jobs rather than helping create them. Boxer says just the opposite.

“Barbara Boxer will claim that things are getting better because of that $862 billion stimulus package,” Fiorina said. “She will claim that things are getting better, but in fact things have gotten worse since that stimulus bill passed."

A recent Boxer comment has given ammunition to critics of her record on the military. The Daily Caller reports:

At a campaign event over the weekend in Inglewood, California, Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer seemingly equated being a politician to serving in the military –- and an Iraq War veteran supporting Boxer’s November opponent is calling on her to apologize.
“We know that if you have veterans in one place where they can befriend each other and talk to each other. You know when you’ve gone through similar things you need to share it. I don’t care whether you are a policeman or a fireman or a veteran or by chance a member of Congress,” the California senator said. “[Democratic Rep.] Maxine [Waters] and I could look at each other and roll our eyes. We know what we are up against. And it is hard for people who are not there to understand the pressure and the great things that go along with it and the tough things that go along with it.”
“Barbara Boxer’s disrespectful comments underscore just how out of touch she has become after her 28 years in Washington,“ Veterans for Carly Coalition Co-Chairman Lt. Commander Paul Chabot said in a press release, in response to Boxer’s comments. “Equating the experiences of members of Congress with those of brave soldiers who have fought to defend our country is just the latest example in a failed career marked by disrespect for our men and women in uniform.”

Not everything is going well for the Fiorina campaign, as David Siders reports for The Sacramento Bee:

Republican U.S. Senate candidate Carly Fiorina might have picked the wrong restaurant to announce her Latino outreach effort.

Fiorina said at a campaign stop at Texas Mexican Restaurant in Sacramento last month that she was pleased to be supported by people like Griselda Barajas, a member of the Sacramento Metro Chamber's board and owner of Griselda's Catering, which hosted the event.

Barajas, a Democrat, was undecided at the time.

Not anymore. Barajas is endorsing incumbent Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer, Boxer's campaign said Monday.





Thursday, July 8, 2010

CA: Senate Race is Close

David Siders reports in The Sacramento Bee:
Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer's job performance rating has fallen to a near record low, though she maintains a narrow, three-point lead over Republican rival Carly Fiorina in the U.S. Senate race, according to a Field Poll released today.
Forty-three percent of registered voters disapprove of the job Boxer is doing, while 42 percent approve, according to the nonpartisan poll. Among likely voters in November, 48 percent disapprove of the job Boxer is doing, the poll showed.
Not since 1994, two years after she was first elected, has Boxer's job rating been so low.
Still, Boxer leads Fiorina 47 percent to 44 percent among likely voters, according to the poll. Fiorina had come within one percentage point of Boxer in March, after trailing by as many as 30 points early last year.
...
In addition to her weak job performance rating, Boxer's general image rating remains below where it stood last year. More likely voters hold an unfavorable view of her than a favorable one, 52 percent to 41 percent, according to the poll.


Boxer is going after Fiorina. Jesse Dungan reports in The Oakland Tribune:

Boxer acknowledged in her Wednesday night appearance that Hewlett-Packard is headquartered in Palo Alto, and she attacked Fiorina's track record at the global computer company, saying Fiorina tripled her salary while laying off numerous workers.

"Carly Fiorina never fought for our families," Boxer said. "She never even tried to."

The senator also took aim at Fiorina's political record: "A lot of people don't know who our opponent is because — guess what? — she never held public office."

Fiorina is not for American jobs, but instead supports corporate breaks and outsourcing, Boxer said.

"You couldn't have two candidates that disagree more on the basic issues of our time," she said.

And Boxer is trying to come across as a Feinstein-style workhorse. Maeve Reston reports in The Los Angeles Times:
For months, her Republican opponent Carly Fiorina has contended that Boxer is a "failed senator" with little to show for her time in the Senate. Fiorina's supporters tailed Boxer on Wednesday with signs bearing that message, and her spokeswoman, Julie Soderlund, kept up the criticism by accusing Boxer of trying to "rewrite the facts about her record and pretend she has actually accomplished something for the people of California."

To refute those attacks, Boxer's staff has spent the last few months cataloging every amendment, earmark and executive order that the senator has worked on over her three terms — posting many of them on her website and assembling packets of the "highlights" for local reporters in each city in her two-day campaign swing across California. The trip marked the formal campaign kickoff for Boxer.